| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 517 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Wartsila India Ltd. vs Janak Mathuradas and Ors.
Scheme for reduction of share capital: Role of sanctioning court-Use of widely accepted methodologies by valuer-The role of the court whilst approving a scheme for reduction of share capital was limited to the extent of ensuring that the scheme was not unconscio [LexDoc Id : 398045]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2010 |
Montreaus Resorts (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs ASCOT Hotels and Resorts Ltd. and Ors.
Order directing parties to maintain status quo in respect of land-No violation of order by obtaining permission of state government for development of land at its own risk-The CLB’s interim order had directed the parties to maintain status quo in respect of land of the company. In contempt petition filed by the petitione [LexDoc Id : 398009]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2010 |
Guangdong Fuwa Engg. Mfg. Co. Ltd. vs ANG Auto Ltd.
Petition for winding up: Jurisdiction of high court-Pendency of a civil suit or arbitration not a bar to winding up proceedings-The respondent’s preliminary contention that the high court had no jurisdiction to entertain the winding up petition and that it should be dismissed d [LexDoc Id : 398008]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2010 |
Gopal Girdharilal Doda vs Vishesh Ispat (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 421510]
|
CLB |
2010 |
Satish Punch and Ors. vs Shree Adinath Concost (P) Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 419970]
|
CLB |
2010 |
Oswal Agro Furane Ltd. (In Liquidation), In re
Balaji Disposals vs KRBL Ltd. and Anr.
Oswal Agro Furane Workers Union vs Oswal Agro Furane Ltd. (In Liquidation) and Ors.
Sale of property of company in liquidation: Application by workers’ union to set aside sale-Entire amount due to workers’ union paid, No buyer offering higher price produced, Application dismissed-The workers’ union had filed an application for setting aside the sale of property of company in liquidation in favour of first respondent pleading th [LexDoc Id : 415292]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2010 |
Goodricke Group Ltd. and Anr. vs Mahmud Hasan Sultan and Anr.
Suit against company for recovery of dues: Territorial jurisdiction of court-No cause of action arising wholly or in part within territorial jurisdiction of district of Kamrup, Principal office of company not located within territorial limits of the court at Guwahati, Suit not maintainable-The first respondent had instituted a money suit against the petitioner-company, which had its registered office at Kolkata and a branch office at Guw [LexDoc Id : 414517]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2010 |
Raheja Builders (P) Ltd. vs Rathi Ferrous Trading (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 398013]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2010 |
OL vs Allahabad Bank and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 442977]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2010 |
Allahabad Bank vs OL, State of Uttar Pradesh and Uttaranchal and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 409939]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2010 |
Mayur Jhunjhunwala vs TRO and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 421388]
|
WBTT |
2010 |
Ammonia Supplies Corpn. (P) Ltd. vs ROC
[LexDoc Id : 397883]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2010 |
Goodhope Vyapaar (P) Ltd., In re, Jagannath Commodities (P) Ltd., In re, Komal Tie-Up (P) Ltd., In re, Omkara Agencies (P) Ltd., In re and Param Mitter Coal Movers (P) Ltd., In re
[LexDoc Id : 397832]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2010 |
Infosys Technologies Ltd. vs Jupiter Infosys Ltd. and Anr.
Pre-requisite that applicant to be a person aggrieved-Applicants grievance to continue till application decided-The Supreme Court held that for filing application under s.46 or s.56 of the Trade Marks Act 1999 or a composite application under both sections, it w [LexDoc Id : 397733]
|
SC |
2010 |
OL vs S. Ravishankar and Ors.
Power of court to assess damages against delinquent directors, etc-Application by OL against ex-directors-The OL, in an application under s.542 and s.543(1) of the Companies Act 1956, contended that the respondents, ex-directors, had failed to furnish the [LexDoc Id : 403546]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2010 |
OL vs L.G. Varadarajulu and Ors.
Valuation of assets of company by directors-Application by OL alleging inflation of value-The OL had filed an application under s.543(1) of the Companies Act 1956 alleging that the ex-directors had inflated the value of the assets more than [LexDoc Id : 402948]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2010 |
Vijay Sekhri and Anr. vs Tinna Oils and Chemicals, Tinna Agro Industries Ltd. and Ors.
Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996: Appealable orders-Appeal under s.10F of Companies Act 1956-The expression ‘court’ appearing in s.50 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 did not refer to ‘court’ simplicitor but had to be construed and [LexDoc Id : 397704]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2010 |
Uniquie Kitchen-Aids (P) Ltd. vs ROC
[LexDoc Id : 397703]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2010 |
Manju Bagai vs Magpie Retail Ltd.
Damages: Liquidated vs Un-liquidated damages-Use of term liquidated in a document-Mere use of the term ‘liquidated damages’ in a document could not be the criteria to determine and decide whether the amount specified in the agreemen [LexDoc Id : 397698]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2010 |
Dwarikadhish Jewels (P) Ltd, In re, Dwarikadhish Capital (P) Ltd., In re, Dwarikadhish Investments (P) Ltd., In re, Dwarikadhish Financial Services (P) Ltd., In re and Dwarikadhish Finance and Investment Co.(P) Ltd., In re
[LexDoc Id : 397695]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2010 |
Jiwan Mehta vs EMM Bros Forgings (P) Ltd. and Ors.
Oppression and Mismanagement-CLB dismissing petition on ground of deliberate concealment of MoU-The appellant had filed a petition under s.397 and s.398 of the Companies Act 1956 before CLB alleging that second and third respondents had become ma [LexDoc Id : 397552]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2010 |
K. Kalyanaram vs V.K. Kalyanasundaram and Sons Hotels (P) Ltd. @ Kences Constructions (P) Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 421627]
|
CLB |
2010 |
Jagatjit Brown Forman vs Mohit Singh
[LexDoc Id : 417350]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2010 |
Vijay Nagpal and Anr. vs Cultivators Haryana (P) Ltd.
Winding up of family company: Inability to pay debts-Winding up jurisdiction discretionary, Petitioners holding substantial number of shares, Company embroiled in various internecine proceedings and other proceedings, Winding up not ordered-Winding up jurisdiction was discretionary and was not to be granted in all cases. A company was incorporated as a family concern to settle the appella [LexDoc Id : 413606]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2010 |
Alchemist Ltd. and Alchemist Foods Ltd., In re
Scheme of demerger: Sanction of court-Notices of meeting for approval or disapproval of scheme sent to all shareholders-The transferor company had sought for demerger of its food division and its merger with its subsidiary, i.e. the transferee company as per the scheme [LexDoc Id : 400855]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2010 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
